![]() Nonetheless, "If a scientist can't be careful, that's as big an indictment as someone who goes around and adjusts data. time, his first interview since the retractions. "These errors are not unheard of in data management," he told ScienceInsider in a phone call on Thursday night U.S. "There is no hard evidence that data are fabricated," says behavioral ecologists Niels Dingemanse of Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU).Īs for Pruitt, he's in the middle of 4 months of fieldwork in Australia and the South Pacific and insists there has been no data fabrication or fraud, saying the data issues are all mistakes. Yet even one of the researchers who initially probed Pruitt's data cautions that what has happened remains unclear. The furor has even earned a Twitter hashtag- #PruittData. All papers using data collected or curated by Pruitt, a highly productive researcher who specialized in social spiders, are coming under scrutiny and those in his field predict there will be many retractions. ![]() ![]() And the more Pruitt's co-authors look, the more potential data problems they find. What began with questions about data in one of Pruitt's papers has flared into a social media–fueled scandal in the small field of animal personality research, with dozens of papers on spiders and other invertebrates being scrutinized by scores of students, postdocs, and other co-authors for problematic data.Īlready, two papers co-authored by Pruitt, now at McMaster University, have been retracted for data anomalies Biology Letters is expected to expunge a third within days. It's been a bad couple of weeks for behavioral ecologist Jonathan Pruitt-the holder of one of the prestigious Canada 150 Research Chairs-and it may get a lot worse. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |